A defense of Sommers
β Scribed by Charles Sayward
- Book ID
- 104781594
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1976
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 194 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0031-8116
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Recently Jon Fjeld has criticized Fred Sommers' type theory. 1 Fjeld begins his paper by nicely outlining the reasons other criticisms of Sommers have failed. Fjeld's own criticism avoids these pitfalls, but, for all that, it also is mistaken. At least that is what I shall argue.
Fjeld concentrates his attack on these two theses which are part of Sommers' theory:
Thesis 1: Every individual belongs to some type. Thesis 2: Every category is identical with a union of types included in it.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Wilhelm Lehmann hat einmal gesagt: Β»Der Dichtung liegt ob, die hinter den Abstraktionen der Zivilisation verschwindende Natur der PhΓ€nomene festzuhalten und als wirklich, d. h. wirksam, geltend zu machen. Die Poesie bewegt aus dem luftlosen in den luftig erfΓΌllten Raum, in Welt ohne Abstraktion... V
Sommers has argued 1 that there is a principle of predication that rules out certain types of ontologies, e.g., the Strawsonian ontology of persons. We will argue that it is his principle, rather than these ontologies, that should be ruled out. The principle that he offers is: If a, b, and c are a