In a recent series of papers F. Sommers has presented a logical theory which, if generally understood by philosophers, could revolutionize our views on logic and ontology. 1 Nevertheless, Sommers' presentation is not completely flawless. I want to show here that he has an unacceptable view of existe
Sommers on predicability
β Scribed by B. A. Brody
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1972
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 135 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0031-8116
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Sommers has argued 1 that there is a principle of predication that rules out certain types of ontologies, e.g., the Strawsonian ontology of persons. We will argue that it is his principle, rather than these ontologies, that should be ruled out.
The principle that he offers is:
If a, b, and c are any three things and P and Q are predicates such that/it makes sense to predicate P of a and of b but not of c and it makes sense to predicate Q of b and c but not of a, then P must be equivocal over a and b or Q must be equivocal over b and c. Conversely, if P and Q are univocal predicates, then there can be no three things a, b, and c such that P applies to a and to b but not to c while Q applies to b and to c but not to a. (pp.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES