𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of test methods for the measurement of hydrogen sensor response and recovery times

✍ Scribed by L. Boon-Brett; G. Black; P. Moretto; J. Bousek


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
710 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0360-3199

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Response time is a critically important property of hydrogen safety sensors. Recovery times are less important from a safety perspective, but are often quoted as an indication of the speed of operation of a sensor. However, the measured values depend highly on the method used to evaluate them. The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of different methods, both flow and diffusion-based, for the measurement of sensor response and recovery times. Four methods have been tested in terms of their repeatability and practicality of execution, as well as the accuracy of their results compared to the manufacturer's specifications. It was found that each method has its own advantages and limitations, which are discussed herein. For the measurement of response times, a diffusion-based method was found to give the shortest and most precise values and is therefore recommended. However, the flow-based method was found to be the most convenient experimentally and is the only method that is suitable for the measurement of recovery times over a wide concentration range.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of extraction and adsorptio
✍ Luis Frontela; Jose A Pozas; Leandro Picabea πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 562 KB

Two different methods of recovering arson accelerants from fire debris are compared: distillation with addition of n-hexane and adsorption onto activated charcoal. Both procedures involve the use of the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) utilizing specific mass ion programs. Some casework

Comparison of measurement methods based
✍ GΓΆran Nilsson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 858 KB

Comparison of methods is a technique often used for investigation of Systematic errors of measurement methods. As concerns the design and analysis of such comparisons, much variety of opinion and practice exists. In one approach a few specimens are measured several times by different operators in di