A comparison of test methods for the measurement of hydrogen sensor response and recovery times
β Scribed by L. Boon-Brett; G. Black; P. Moretto; J. Bousek
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 710 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0360-3199
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Response time is a critically important property of hydrogen safety sensors. Recovery times are less important from a safety perspective, but are often quoted as an indication of the speed of operation of a sensor. However, the measured values depend highly on the method used to evaluate them. The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of different methods, both flow and diffusion-based, for the measurement of sensor response and recovery times. Four methods have been tested in terms of their repeatability and practicality of execution, as well as the accuracy of their results compared to the manufacturer's specifications. It was found that each method has its own advantages and limitations, which are discussed herein. For the measurement of response times, a diffusion-based method was found to give the shortest and most precise values and is therefore recommended. However, the flow-based method was found to be the most convenient experimentally and is the only method that is suitable for the measurement of recovery times over a wide concentration range.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Two different methods of recovering arson accelerants from fire debris are compared: distillation with addition of n-hexane and adsorption onto activated charcoal. Both procedures involve the use of the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) utilizing specific mass ion programs. Some casework
Comparison of methods is a technique often used for investigation of Systematic errors of measurement methods. As concerns the design and analysis of such comparisons, much variety of opinion and practice exists. In one approach a few specimens are measured several times by different operators in di