Two methods of setting confidence intervals for test scores and testing the significance of test score differences are compared with respect to their simplicity and the similarity of their results. The conventional method, which is based on obtained scores, is unquestionably simpler than the technic
β¦ LIBER β¦
A comparison of testing and confidence interval methods for the median
β Scribed by Simon J. Sheather; Joseph W. McKean
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 364 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0167-7152
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Confidence intervals for test scores and
β
Arthur B. Silverstein
π
Article
π
1989
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 346 KB
π 2 views
Confidence Intervals for CostβEffectiven
β
Daniel Polsky; Henry A. Glick; Richard Willke; Kevin Schulman
π
Article
π
1997
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 90 KB
π 2 views
We evaluated four methods for computing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios developed from randomized controlled trials: the box method, the Taylor series method, the nonparametric bootstrap method and the Fieller theorem method. We performed a Monte Carlo experiment to compare these
Two-sided confidence intervals for the s
β
Robert G. Newcombe
π
Article
π
1998
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 197 KB
π 2 views
Comparison of three methods of estimatin
β
William E. Butler
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 302 KB
π 2 views
Significance tests and confidence interv
β
Wolfgang Reh; Bernard Scheffler
π
Article
π
1996
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 244 KB
A Comparative Statistical Analysis of Ge
β
Mariano Katz
π
Article
π
1989
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 890 KB