✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of three methods of estimating confidence intervals for stereotactic error

✍ Scribed by William E. Butler

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 302 KB
Volume: 4
Category: Article
ISSN: 1092-9088
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0150(1999)4:1<26::aid-igs3>3.0.co;2-u

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Confidence Intervals for Cost–Effectiven

Confidence Intervals for Cost–Effectiveness Ratios: A Comparison of Four Methods

✍ Daniel Polsky; Henry A. Glick; Richard Willke; Kevin Schulman 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB 👁 2 views

We evaluated four methods for computing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios developed from randomized controlled trials: the box method, the Taylor series method, the nonparametric bootstrap method and the Fieller theorem method. We performed a Monte Carlo experiment to compare these

Comparison of Confidence Intervals for A

Comparison of Confidence Intervals for Adjusted Attributable Risk Estimates under Multinomial Sampling

✍ Andrea Lehnert-Batar; Annette Pfahlberg; Olaf Gefeller 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The epidemiologic concept of the adjusted attributable risk is a useful approach to quantitatively describe the importance of risk factors on the population level. It measures the proportional reduction in disease probability when a risk factor is eliminated from the population, account

Two-sided confidence intervals for the s

Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods

✍ Robert G. Newcombe 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 197 KB 👁 2 views

Interval estimation for the difference b

Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods

✍ Robert G. Newcombe 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 223 KB 👁 2 views

Several existing unconditional methods for setting confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions are evaluated. Computationally simpler methods are prone to a variety of aberrations and poor coverage properties. The closely interrelated methods of Mee and Miettinen and Nurmine

Method comparison on confidence interval

Method comparison on confidence interval construction for the slope in a linear measurement model with heteroscedastic errors

✍ Jia-Ren Tsai; Chen-Tuo Liao 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 279 KB

Confidence intervals for test scores and

Confidence intervals for test scores and significance tests for test score differences: A comparison of methods

✍ Arthur B. Silverstein 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 346 KB 👁 2 views

Two methods of setting confidence intervals for test scores and testing the significance of test score differences are compared with respect to their simplicity and the similarity of their results. The conventional method, which is based on obtained scores, is unquestionably simpler than the technic