Seventeen patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and spirogermanium, a recently developed azaspiran-germanium compound remarkable for its lack of hematologic, gastrointestinal, renal or hepatic toxicity. Response to treatment and the incidence a
A combination of 5-fluorouracil and thymidine in advanced colorectal carcinoma
โ Scribed by Ahud Sternberg; Nicholas J. Petrelli; Jesse Au; Youcef Rustum; Arnold Mittelman; Patrick Creaven
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 457 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0344-5704
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Concurrent administration of thymidine (TdR) has been shown to increase the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various experimental models. The clinical response rate, side-effects, and toxicity of 5-FU and TdR were evaluated in 27 patients with advanced colorectal carcinomas. Each 6-day treatment course consisted of an IV loading dose of TdR (405 mg/kg, over 30 min), followed by continuous IV infusions of 5-FU (7.5 mg/kg per day for 5 days), and TdR (216 mg/kg per day for 6 days); courses were repeated every 4 weeks. The overall partial response rate was 4.5%, or 16.7% in patients with no prior 5-FU chemotherapy. Short-lived stable disease was seen at an overall rate of 27.3%, half of these patients with prior 5-FU chemotherapy. Myelotoxicity occurred in 64% of the patients, but this was dose-limiting in only 20%. Gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms were mild and infrequent. There was one case of treatment-related death due to sepsis secondary to leukopenia. It is concluded that the concurrent IV administration of 5-FU and TdR does not improve the response rate over that obtained with 5-FU alone.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Thirty patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer received monthly courses of a combination of dacarbazine, mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, and vincristine (FIVMit-Or). Four of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. Two patients were not evaluable for response. Objective response was ob