## Abstract In an article in this journal, Nicholas Pastore rejected Ludwig Wittgenstein's critique of Wolfgang Köhler and Gestalt psychology. Pastore appears not to have appreciated Wittgenstein's argument that Köhler mistook conceptual questions for factual ones. A simi‐lar confusion seems to und
Wittgenstein on Köhler and Gestalt psychology: A critique
✍ Scribed by Nicholas Pastore
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 734 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5061
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Wittgenstein's objections to Kohler and gestalt psychology are critically examined. Principal features of Kohler's Gestalt Psychology are discussed that are relevant to Wittgenstein's views. They include Kohler's concepts of "subjective" and "objective" experiences, "sensory organization," and "empiristic theory." Wittgenstein's objections, which focus on the concept of sensory organization, are examined. Wittgenstein employs the term "aspect," which is derived from the findings of gestalt psychology, as a replacement for Kohler's term "sensory organization." After tracing his uses of aspect, it is shown that aspect is a superordinate entity distinct from 'sensory content' (colors and shapes). This dualism of aspect and sensory content is of the same kind that prevailed in the empiristic theory of visual perception. Wittgenstein's adherence to the empiristic theory is discussed. Finally, the difference between Wittgenstein's aspect and Kohler's sensory organization is examined.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The scientist±practitioner philosophy of clinical practice is first placed in its historical context. The history of the scientist±practitioner stance is marked by an enduring struggle between advocates and opponents of a research-based profession of clinical psychology. The criticisms of the scient
## Abstract The authors present background on the gestalt‐experiential understanding of resistance, conceptualized to be either __resistance to awareness__ or __resistance to contact__. The authors discuss why they do not use the term __resistance__ and describe the phenomena as a client's self‐pro