For decades, NHS clinical psychologists have struggled to implement the scientist±practitioner model of professional practice. The pressure for effectiveness and efficiency in health services internationally, and the advent of the NHS research and development (R & D) strategy in the UK make this a s
The Scientist–Practitioner Model in Clinical Psychology: A Critique
✍ Scribed by Clive G. Long; Clive R. Hollin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 120 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1063-3995
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The scientist±practitioner philosophy of clinical practice is first placed in its historical context. The history of the scientist±practitioner stance is marked by an enduring struggle between advocates and opponents of a research-based profession of clinical psychology. The criticisms of the scientist±practitioner stance are discussed alongside counterarguments in support of that position. Making the conceptual distinction between theoretical preference and philosophical position, three philosophies to underpin clinical psychology are outlined. It is concluded that the fundamental research to decide on the optimum stance for effective practice, and hence to inform training, is sadly lacking.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Psychological testing has firmly established itself as a diagnostic procedure in clinical practice. The tests employed and the diagnostic uses to which they are put are well known and it is not proposed to review them here. Rather let us face the fact that diagnostic testing is at present in a state