A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion In January 1973, the Supreme Courtβs opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abort
What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision, Revised Edition
β Scribed by Jack M. Balkin (editor)
- Publisher
- New York University Press
- Year
- 2023
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 338
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion
In January 1973, the Supreme Courtβs opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Courtβs 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Courtβs legitimacy.
Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty yearsβ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigationβand the constitutional and political clashes that followed itβand explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath.
β¦ Table of Contents
Contents
Preface to the Revised Edition
Part I Introduction
Roe v. Wade: An Engine of Controversy
Part II Revised Opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton
Chief Justice Balkin announced the judgment of the Court
Siegel, J., concurring
Tushnet, J., concurring
Allen, J., concurring in the judgement
Rubenfeld, J., concurring in the judgment except as to Doe
West, J., concurring in the judgement
Sunstein, J., concurring in the judgment
Amar, J., concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe
Rosen, J., dissenting
Collett, J., dissenting
Paulsen, J., dissenting.
Comments from the Contributors
Appendix. The Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions
Roe v. Wade: A Selected Bibliography
About the Contributors
Table of Cases
Index
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion In January 1973, the Supreme Courtβs opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal ab
Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the auth
<p>Nine of America's top legal experts rewrite the landmark desegregation decision as they would like it to have been written.</p> <p><i>Brown v. Board of Education</i>, the Supreme Court's landmark 1954 decision ordering the desegregation of America's public schools, is perhaps the most famous case
<p><span>A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion</span><span><br><br>In January 1973, the Supreme Courtβs opinion in </span><span>Roe v. Wade</span><span> struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitu
"In this updated edition Faux details recent challenges and erosions to the decision - including parental consent laws and bans on partial-birth abortions - and illuminates how the ruling has impacted public attitudes and policy. Dominating health care funding, religious ideologies, and party platfo