𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision

✍ Scribed by Jack M. Balkin


Publisher
New York University Press
Year
2023
Tongue
English
Leaves
339
Edition
Revised
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion

In January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.

Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigationβ€”and the constitutional and political clashes that followed itβ€”and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The N
✍ Jack M. Balkin (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2023 πŸ› New York University Press 🌐 English

<p><b>A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion</b><br><br>In January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in <i>Roe v. Wade</i> struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right

What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The N
✍ Jack M. Balkin πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2023 πŸ› NYU Press 🌐 English

A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion In January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abort

What Obergefell V. Hodges Should Have Sa
✍ Jack M. Balkin (ed.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› Yale University Press 🌐 English

Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the auth

What Brown v. Board of Education Should
✍ Jack M. Balkin (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› New York University Press 🌐 English

<p>Nine of America's top legal experts rewrite the landmark desegregation decision as they would like it to have been written.</p> <p><i>Brown v. Board of Education</i>, the Supreme Court's landmark 1954 decision ordering the desegregation of America's public schools, is perhaps the most famous case

What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said
✍ Jack M. Balkin (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2023 πŸ› NYU Press 🌐 English

<p><span>A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion</span><span><br><br>In January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in </span><span>Roe v. Wade</span><span> struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitu

Roe v. Wade: the untold story of the lan
✍ Roe, Jane;Wade, Henry;Faux, Marian πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Cooper Square Press 🌐 English

"In this updated edition Faux details recent challenges and erosions to the decision - including parental consent laws and bans on partial-birth abortions - and illuminates how the ruling has impacted public attitudes and policy. Dominating health care funding, religious ideologies, and party platfo