𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Wet Milling Comparison of Quality ProteinMaize and Normal Maize

✍ Scribed by Martínez, B F; Sevilla, P E; Bjarnason, M


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
478 KB
Volume
71
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-5142

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Quality protein maize (QPM) experimental hybrids and normal maize possessing different physical and chemical properties were studied as the raw material for wet milling. Maize samples were steeped for 36 h in a 600-ml sohtion containing 15 g kg-' lactic acid and 0.5 g kg-' SO, followed by 12 h in a second 600-ml solution containing 5 g kg-' lactic acid and 1 g kg-' SO,. The steeped grain was then wet milled and the yields and purity of fractions were analysed. Water-soluble solids, kernel size, quality protein, total dietary fibre and ash content were higher in QPM samples than in normal maize. Water-soluble solids were positively correlated to kernel size (r = 0.97, P < 0.05), test weight ( I = 0.83, P < 0.05) and density (r = 0.57, P < 0.05). Total fraction recovery for the five hybrids tested ranged from 921 to 955 g kg-', with the highest values corresponding to QPM hybrids. QPM hybrids yielded slightly higher starch content than normal maize. Gluten yields of QPM-HO (high oil) presented the highest values. The lysine contents of kernel, gluten and milling solubles were highest for QPM hybrids. QPM contained more palmitic acid than the other hybrids. The H-137 normal maize and QPM yellow dent-HO contained more oleic and linolenic acids than the other samples, and the QPM white-C (corneous) contained more linoleic acid than QPM-HO and normal maize.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Assessment of protein nutritional qualit
✍ Fufa, Habtamu ;Akalu, Girma ;Wondimu, Asrat ;Taffesse, Samson ;Gebre, Takele ;Sc 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 188 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The present study was designed to quantitatively measure and compare the levels and variations of total protein, individual amino acids, and computed protein efficiency ratio (C‐PER) in raw and traditionally processed products of one recently released quality protein maize (QPM BH542) w