## Abstract The general public understands that there is uncertainty inherent in deterministic forecasts as well as understanding some of the factors that increase uncertainty. This was determined in an online survey of 1340 residents of Washington and Oregon, USA. Understanding was probed using qu
Weight space analysis and forecast uncertainty
✍ Scribed by Arnfried Ossen; Stefan M. Rüger
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 387 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The usage of location information of weight vectors can help to overcome de®ciencies of gradient-based learning for neural networks. We study the non-trivial structure of weight space, i.e. symmetries of feedforward networks in terms of their corresponding groups. We ®nd that these groups naturally act on and partition weight space into disjunct domains. We derive an algorithm to generate representative weight vectors in a fundamental domain. The analysis of the metric structure of the fundamental domain leads to a clustering method that exploits the natural metric of the fundamental domain. It can be implemented eciently even for large networks. We used it to improve the assessment of forecast uncertainty for an already successful application of neural networks in the area of ®nancial time series.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Over the past few years, considerable progress has been made in the area of macroeconomic and financial forecasting. This special issue presents recent theoretical and empirical contributions related to forecast uncertainty. The assessment of forecasts and their uncertainty is of particular interest
A very general algebraic framework, known as Chu spaces, has recently been systematically used in modeling of information flow in distributed systems and in modeling of concurrency in computer science. In this paper, we explore this framework in the context of uncertainty modeling and analysis. We i
## Abstract Using a standard decomposition of forecast errors into common and idiosyncratic shocks, we show that aggregate forecast uncertainty can be expressed as the disagreement among the forecasters plus the perceived variability of future aggregate shocks. Thus the reliability of disagreement