## Abstract Is uncertainty expressed as frequency easier for nonβexperts to understand than uncertainty expressed as probability? The experiment reported here compared participants' responses to the same wind speed forecast expressed several different ways. Three different uncertainty expressions w
Communicating forecast uncertainty: public perception of weather forecast uncertainty
β Scribed by Susan Joslyn; Sonia Savelli
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 463 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1350-4827
- DOI
- 10.1002/met.190
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The general public understands that there is uncertainty inherent in deterministic forecasts as well as understanding some of the factors that increase uncertainty. This was determined in an online survey of 1340 residents of Washington and Oregon, USA. Understanding was probed using questions that asked participants what they expected to observe when given a deterministic forecast with a specified lead time, for a particular weather parameter, during a particular time of year. It was also probed by asking participants to estimate the number of observations, out of 100, that they expected to fall within specified ranges around the deterministic forecast. Almost all respondents (99.99%) anticipated some uncertainty in the deterministic forecast. Furthermore, their answers suggested that they expected greater uncertainty for longer lead times when the forecasted value deviated from climatic norms. Perhaps most noteworthy was that they expected specific forecast biases (e.g. overβforecasting of extremes), most of which were not borne out by an analysis of local National Weather Service verification data. In summary, users had wellβformed uncertainty expectations suggesting that they are prepared to understand explicit uncertainty forecasts for a wide range of parameters. Indeed, explicit uncertainty estimates may be necessary to overcome some of the anticipated forecast biases that may be affecting the usefulness of existing weather forecasts. Despite the fact that these bias expectations are largely unjustified, they could lead to adjustment of forecasts that could in turn have serious negative consequences for users, especially with respect to extreme weather warnings. Copyright Β© 2010 Royal Meteorological Society
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract There is a common agreement in the scientific community that communicating uncertain hydroβmeteorological forecasts to water managers, civil protection authorities and other stakeholders is far from being a resolved issue. This paper focuses on the communication of uncertain hydrologica
## Abstract The hydrometeorological community has limited understanding of how people interpret forecast information and use it in decision making, hampering effective forecast communication. This article addresses these issues in the context of weather prediction, focusing especially on forecast u
## Abstract Seasonal streamflow forecasts based on climate information can guide water managers toward superior reservoir operations, leading to improved water resources management efficiency. Uncertainty, however, is always present in seasonal streamflow forecasts, affecting the forecast value. Th
This paper explores why expectations elicited from corporate decision-makers may fall short of the rational expectations ideal: the formation of an informed forecast may just not be part of the optimal management of uncertainty. The analysis of an investment decision shows that when forecasting is e