๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Weighing the pros and cons for composite outcomes in clinical trials

โœ Scribed by Nick Freemantle; Melanie Calvert


Book ID
116623077
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
55 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
0895-4356

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The pros and cons of clinical trials
โœ Eden, O.B. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 18 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views
Pros and cons of permutation tests in cl
โœ Vance W. Berger ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 94 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Hypothesis testing, in which the null hypothesis speci"es no di!erence between treatment groups, is an important tool in the assessment of new medical interventions. For randomized clinical trials, permutation tests that re#ect the actual randomization are design-based analyses for such hypotheses.

Pros and cons in the case for DDT
โœ Thomas H. Jukes ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1972 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 711 KB