✦ LIBER ✦

Composite outcomes in randomized clinical trials: arguments for and against

✍ Scribed by Sue Ross

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Weighing the pros and cons for composite

✍ Nick Freemantle; Melanie Calvert 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB

Data that may shed some light on: “Argum

✍ John Carroll; Eustaquio Onorato; Jeffrey Saver; Richard Smalling; David Thaler; 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 58 KB

Validation of Surrogate Endpoints in Mul

✍ Didier Renard; Helena Geys; Geert Molenberghs; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 129 KB 👁 1 views

Adaptive Randomization for BMT Clinical

✍ R.T. Sabo; C.H. Roberts; A.A. Toor; H.M. Chung; W.B. Clark; R.W. Edwards; J. And 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 81 KB

Imputation Strategies for Missing Contin

✍ Monica Taljaard; Allan Donner; Neil Klar 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 139 KB 👁 2 views

Composite outcomes in clinical trials: w

✍ Nancy M. Heddle; Richard J. Cook 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB