We use properties of Day's norm on c 0 (}) to prove that, for every Eberlein compact space K, there exists a separately continuous symmetric mapping d: K\_K Ä R such that we have d(x, y)< d(x, x)+d( y, y) 2 for any two distinct points x and y of K. As a consequence, we have that every Eberlein compa
Weakly Ramsey Sets in Banach Spaces
✍ Scribed by Joan Bagaria; Jordi López-Abad
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 347 KB
- Volume
- 160
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0001-8708
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Gowers' analysis of the combinatorial content of his celebrated dichotomy for infinite-dimensional separable Banach spaces [7] led him to the formulation of the property of being weakly Ramsey applied to sets of block bases, a combinatorial notion related to the classical Ramsey property for infinite sets of positive integers. Let [N] | be the set of all infinite sets of positive integers. With the natural topology induced by the Cantor space via characteristic functions, [N] | is a Polish space. A subset _ [N] | is Ramsey if there exists A # [N] | such that either [A] | _ or [A] | & _=<, where [A] | is the set of all infinite subsets of A. The famous Galvin Prikry theorem asserts that every Borel subset of [N] | is Ramsey ([4]) or, equivalently, that every Borel map from [N] | into a finite space is constant on a cube [A] | .
Silver [17] shows that, in fact, all analytic subsets of [N] | , i.e., the continuous images of Borel sets, are Ramsey. A simpler, more combinatorial proof is given by Ellentuck [3]. The Ramsey property for more complex subsets of [N] | turns out to depend essentially on the axioms of set theory. Thus, for instance, while Go del's axiom of constructibility implies that some continuous image of a co-analytic set is not Ramsey (see [9]), Martin's axiom implies that all such sets are Ramsey [17]. Furthermore, large-cardinal axioms, or determinacy axioms, imply that all projective, or
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES