𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Water in methacrylates—I. Sorption and desorption properties of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-glycol dimethacrylate) networks

✍ Scribed by P.E.M. Allen; D.J. Bennett; D.R.G. Williams

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
521 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0014-3057

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Water in methacrylates—II. dynamic mecha
Water in methacrylates—II. dynamic mechanical properties of swollen poly poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-glycol dimethacrylate) networks
✍ P.E.M. Allen; D.J. Bennett; D.R.G. Williams 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 407 KB

A~traet--The effects of copolymer composition and water content on shear modulus were determined by torsion-pendulum measurements. Water had a plasticizing effect on all samples tested, but the effect of water content and copolymer composition did not conform to extant empirical and theoretical rela

Water in methacrylates—IV. structures an
Water in methacrylates—IV. structures and organization in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-glycol dimethacrylate) networks
✍ P.E.M. Allen; D.J. Bennett; D.R.G. Williams 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 487 KB

Differential Scanning Calorimetry and tH-NMR line width measurements have been used to study the structure, organization and mobility of water in methacrylate copolymer networks. A tripartite classification emerged: freezable, mobile and constrained water, however, like the various bipartite classif

Water in urethane acrylates—1. Sorption
Water in urethane acrylates—1. Sorption and desorption properties of urethane acrylate-co-glycol acrylate networks
✍ A.B. Clayton; P.E.M. Allen; D.R.G. Williams 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 504 KB

Sorption and desorption kinetics of water uptake in urethane acrylate and urethane acrylatecoglycol acrylate networks are reported and analysed in terms of Fick's and Frisch's laws. The Frisch parameter n calculated for sorption ranged from 0.4 to 0.6, while that for desorption ranged from 0.5 to 0.