𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Vinorelbine in elderly patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma : A Phase II study

✍ Scribed by Gianfranco Buccheri; Domenico Ferrigno


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
109 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


BACKGROUND.

Cancer in the elderly is becoming a complex and frequent issue. At least 30% of lung carcinomas are expected to arise each year in elderly patients, who often have significant comorbidity. The most appropriate treatment for this large portion of cancer patients remains unknown. The purpose of this Phase II trial was to make a comprehensive evaluation of the activity, toxicity, and tolerability of single-agent vinorelbine in elderly and relatively poorly performing patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS.

Patients age 70 years or older were eligible to participate in this trial if they had a pathologic diagnosis, a performance status lower than 4 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] scale), and gave informed consent. Vinorelbine was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 25 mg/m 2 every week until progression, persistent toxicity, or refusal.

RESULTS.

Forty-six patients entered the study; their median age was 75 years (range, 70 -83 years). Five patients never started on vinorelbine; 27 others had early treatment suspensions. The median number of weekly infusions was 5 (range, 0 -28); the median dose intensity was 70% of projected. Toxicity was generally mild, mainly hematologic, and never life-threatening. ECOG performance status, body weight, and almost all the scores from the quality-of-life questionnaires remained constant during the first 6 weeks of treatment. Two patients obtained partial response, 10 patients had some tumor regression, and 26 had tumor stabilization.

The estimated median time to progression was 19 weeks (quartile range, 11-23 weeks), and the median survival 34 weeks (quartile range, 16 -63 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS.

In our group of patients who had poor prognoses, vinorelbine was well tolerated, moderately active, and capable of ensuring relatively long survival.

It may represent a valuable therapeutic option for the treatment of nonresectable NSCLC in elderly patients.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced
✍ Rogerio Lilenbaum; Roberto Cano; Michael Schwartz; Leonard Siegel; Jose Lutzky; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 73 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The authors conducted a Phase II study to evaluate the activity of the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). ## METHODS. Patients were eligible if they had Stage IIIB (malignant pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC, no prior chemo

Phase I trial of docetaxel and vinorelbi
✍ Vincent A. Miller; Kenneth K. Ng; Lee M. Krug; Wendy Perez; Barbara Pizzo; Rober πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 76 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Background: With preclinical evidence of synergy, this dose-finding trial examining the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine given with prophylactic filgrastim for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma was undertaken. ## Methods: Twenty-seven patients with advanced no

A phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant chemot
✍ Jean Viallet; Marc-AndrΓ© Brassard; Luis Souhami; Joseph Ayoub; Pierre Del Vecchi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 108 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## BACKGROUND. Both locoregional and distant disease control remains poor in the treatment of Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). This trial was conducted to evaluate the tolerance and responses of patients with NSCLC given a neoadjuvant regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine chemotherapy

A phase II trial of oral tegafur and ura
✍ Yukito Ichinose; Nobuko Takanashi; Tokujiro Yano; Hiroshi Asoh; Hideki Yokoyama; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 391 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Background: The combination of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration (uft) has a greater antitumor activity than 5-fluorouracil (5-fu) and tegafur. because the combination of 5-fu and cisplatin has been proven to have a synergistic antitumor effect in many experimental and clinical stu