๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Phase I trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

โœ Scribed by Vincent A. Miller; Kenneth K. Ng; Lee M. Krug; Wendy Perez; Barbara Pizzo; Robert T. Heelan; Mark G. Kris


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
76 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Background:

With preclinical evidence of synergy, this dose-finding trial examining the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine given with prophylactic filgrastim for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma was undertaken.

Methods:

Twenty-seven patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks at 1 of 7 different dose levels. vinorelbine was escalated from 15 mg/m(2) (level i) to 45 mg/m(2) (level vii) and docetaxel was increased from 50 mg/m(2) (level i) to 60 mg/m(2) (level vii). prophylactic corticosteroids and filgrastim were employed prospectively.

Results:

After completion of dose level vii, accrual was terminated because phase ii dose intensity of both agents had been reached and further escalation was believed to be unsafe. at dose level vii, one episode of first-cycle febrile neutropenia and a death after three treatment cycles due to haemophilus influenzae sepsis (grade 5 toxicity according to the common toxicity criteria of the national cancer institute) without neutropenia were noted. in all, 209 treatment cycles were administered and febrile neutropenia was observed in only 4 of these treatments (1.9%). bacteremia occurred in three patients (four episodes) in the absence of neutropenia. symptomatic onycholysis was observed in three patients. clinically significant peripheral neuropathy and fluid retention were rare. confirmed partial responses were noted in 10 patients for a response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 20-57%).

Conclusions:

Docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2), both given every 2 weeks, can be combined safely to achieve phase ii dose intensity of both agents. an ongoing phase ii trial will define the activity of this treatment combination.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


First-line treatment of advanced nonsmal
โœ Charalambos Kourousis; Nicos Androulakis; Stelios Kakolyris; John Souglakos; Geo ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 87 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

BACKGROUND. Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was evaluated in a Phase II study in patients with advanced NSCLC. ## METHODS. Forty-six chemotherapy-naive patients (44 men and 2 women

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced
โœ Rogerio Lilenbaum; Roberto Cano; Michael Schwartz; Leonard Siegel; Jose Lutzky; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 73 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The authors conducted a Phase II study to evaluate the activity of the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). ## METHODS. Patients were eligible if they had Stage IIIB (malignant pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC, no prior chemo

Vinorelbine in elderly patients with ino
โœ Gianfranco Buccheri; Domenico Ferrigno ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 109 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. Cancer in the elderly is becoming a complex and frequent issue. At least 30% of lung carcinomas are expected to arise each year in elderly patients, who often have significant comorbidity. The most appropriate treatment for this large portion of cancer patients remains unknown. The