𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Variations on the standard protocol design of the hepatocyte DNA repair assay

✍ Scribed by T. R. Barfknecht; R. W. Naismith; D. J. Kornbrust


Publisher
Springer
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
837 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0742-2091

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Several variations on the standard primary rat hepatocyte DNA/repair assay were evaluated for their ability to enhance the sensitivity of this genotoxicity test system. The use of hamster hepatocytes proved to be a much more sensitive system than rat hepatocytes for detecting the DNA repair inducing ability of the nitrosamines, dimethylnitrosamine and diethylnitrosamine, and the aromatic amines, 2-acetylaminofluorene, 9-aminoacridine, 1naphthylamine and benzidine. In addition, hamster hepatocytes were a more sensitive indicator of the genotoxicity of the azo dyes, o-aminoazotoluene, Congo Red and Evans Blue. However, the azo reduction product of the azo dyes Congo Red, Trypan Blue and Evans Blue, benzidine and o-tolidine, respectively, were active in both rat and hamster hepatocytes at concentrations that were 10-lOO foM lower than the parent dyes. This suggests that little or no azo reduction of the dyes occurred in the in vitro assay systems. The in vivo-in vitro variation of the rat hepatocytes DNA/repair assay exhibited a positive DNA repair response with the azo dye solvent Yellow 5, which was negative in the standard in vitro assay. The in vivo-in vitro hepatocyte DNA repair assay was also more sensitive for detecting the genotoxic activity of Evans Blue, which was positive in the in vivo-in vitro assay and equivocal in the standard in vitro assay. Also, Solvent Yellow 14 was negative in the in vitro assay, but induced an equivocal DNA repair response in the in vivo-in vitro assay system. A treatment/ 3 H-thymidine labeling period of approximately 18 hours, compared to 4 hours, was demonstrated to be superior for detecting the DNA repair elicited by the mutagens 4-nitroquinoline-l-oxide, mitomycin C, dimethylnitrosamine and methyl methanesulfonate in the in vitro rat hepatocyte assay. There was little or no difference observed between the 4 hour and 18 hour treatment/labeling incubation periods for the detection of DNA repair induced by 2-acetylaminofluorene, ariatoxin B~, and benzidine. The data suggest that these several variations on the standard rat hepatocyte DNA/repair assay should be considered when evaluating the genotoxicity of chemicals for safety purposes.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Pretreatment with mixed-function oxidase
✍ J. G. Shaddock; R. H. Heflich; D. C. McMillan; J. A. Hinson; D. A. Casciano πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 752 KB

A recent National Toxicology Program evaluation indicates that the rat hepatocyte/DNA repair assay has a high false-negative rate and that it is insensitive to some genotoxic hepatocarcinogens as well as other species and organ-specific carcinogens. In this study, we examined whether the sensitivity

Effect of varying the exposure and3H-thy
✍ T. R. Barfknecht; D. J. Mecca; R. W. Naismith πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 717 KB

Barfknecht, Mecca and Naismith mammalian cell DNA, induced no detectable DNA repair in hepatocytes up to a toxic dose level of 2 X lO-SM with the 4 hour exposure period, whereas a marked DNA repair response was observed at lO-S M when the 18-20 hour exposure~labeling period was used.

Multiple sequential periods of DNA synth
✍ Krammie Chan; Diane P. Kost; George Michalopoulos πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 763 KB

Repeated periods of DNA synthesis activity (each period consisting of two to three cycles) separated by intervals of quiescence in primary rat hepatocytes can be stimulated by sequential addition and removal of 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in the presence of epidermal growth factor (ECF). Hepatocyte