## Abstract Solid‐phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (SPE‐DLLME) was applied for the extraction of six organophosphorous pesticides (OPPs) in water samples. The analytes considered in this study were determined by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry and in
Validated dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for analysis of organophosphorous pesticides in water
✍ Scribed by Andreia Cristina Henriques Alves; Maria Margarida Pontes Boavida Gonçalves; Maria Manuel Serrano Bernardo; Benilde Simões Mendes
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 158 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) was applied to the determination of six organophosphorous pesticides (OPPs) in water samples. The analytes included in this study were prophos, diazinon, chlorpyrifos methyl, methyl parathion, fenchlorphos and chlorpyrifos. Several extraction and dispersion solvents were tested for dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of these analytes and the best results were obtained using chloroform as extraction solvent and 2‐propanol as dispersion solvent. Calibration curves of the analytes in water samples were constructed in the concentration range from 100 to 1100 ng/L for prophos, diazinon and methyl parathion and in the range from 100 to 1000 ng/L for chlorpyrifos methyl, fenchlorphos and chlorpyrifos. Limits of detection (LODs) were in the range of 1.5–9.1 ng/L and limits of quantification (LOQs) were in the range of 5.1–30.3 ng/L, below the maximum admissible level for drinking water. Relative standard deviations (RSDs) were between 6.5 and 10.1% in the concentration range of 100–1000 ng/L. The relative recoveries (%RRs) of tap, well and irrigation water samples fortified at 800 ng/L were in the range of 46.1–129.4%, with a larger matrix effect being detected in tap water.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was developed for the extraction and preconcentration of aromatic amine from environmental water. A suitable mixture of extraction solvent (100 μL, 1‐__butyl__‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophoshate) and dispersive solvent (750
## Abstract In this study, the organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) levels in lake and tap water samples were determined by a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method using a low‐density organic solvent and an improved solvent collection system (DLLME‐ISCS). This method used a very small volume
## Abstract The process of surfactant‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (SA‐DLLME) followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐UV detection was successfully applied for the extraction and determination of selected cannabinoids (cannabidiol, Δ^9^‐tetrahydrocannabinol, and cann
## Abstract This paper describes a new method for rapid and sensitive determination of diflubenzuron, flufenoxuron, triflumuron and chlorfluazuron in water samples by ultrasound‐assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction in combination with HPLC. Ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimid
## Abstract A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐fluorescence detector, has been developed for the determination of guaifenesin (GUA) enantiomers in human urine samples after an oral dose administ