✦ LIBER ✦

Valid Inference in Random Effects Meta-Analysis

✍ Scribed by Dean A. Follmann; Michael A. Proschan

Book ID: 110724584
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 611 KB
Volume: 55
Category: Article
ISSN: 0006-341X
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00732.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Grouped random effects models for Bayesi

Grouped random effects models for Bayesian meta-analysis

✍ Daniel T. Larose; Dipak K. Dey 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 142 KB 👁 3 views

Meta-analysis refers to quantitative methods to combine results from independent studies so as to draw overall conclusions. Frequently, results from dissimilar studies are inappropriately combined, resulting in suspect inferential synthesis. We present a straightforward method to identify and addres

A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-a

A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis

✍ Julian P. T. Higgins; Simon G. Thompson; David J. Spiegelhalter 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 698 KB

Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in

Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

✍ Guido Knapp; Brad J. Biggerstaff; Joachim Hartung 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB 👁 3 views

A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS W

A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTS

✍ REBECCA J. HARDY; SIMON G. THOMPSON 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 694 KB

In a meta-analysis of a set of clinical trials, a crucial but problematic component is providing an estimate and confidence interval for the overall treatment effect 8. Since in the presence of heterogeneity a fixed effect approach yields an artificially narrow confidence interval for 0, the random

Comparison of two random-effects methods

Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.

✍ Hall, Steven M.; Brannick, Michael T. 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 American Psychological Association 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB

Meta-analysis by random effect modelling

Meta-analysis by random effect modelling in generalized linear models

✍ Murray Aitkin 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 94 KB 👁 3 views

The meta-analysis of multi-centre trials can be based on either "xed or random e!ect models. This paper argues for the general use of random e!ect models, and illustrates the value of non-parametric maximum likelihood (NPML) analysis of such trials. The same general approach uni"es administrative &l