๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Uttering Trees (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)

โœ Scribed by Norvin Richards


Publisher
The MIT Press
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Leaves
247
Series
Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 56
Edition
1
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A study of the interface between syntax and phonology that seeks deeper explanations for such syntactic problems as case phenomena and the distribution of overt and covert wh-movement.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Barriers (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
โœ Noam Chomsky ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› The MIT Press ๐ŸŒ English

This monograph explores several complex questions concerning the theories of government and bounding, including, in particular, the possibility of a unified approach to these topics. Starting with the intuitive idea that certain categories in certain c

Dynamic Antisymmetry (Linguistic Inquiry
โœ Andrea Moro ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐ŸŒ English

The central idea of Dynamic Antisymmetry is that movement and phrase structure are not independent properties of grammar; more specifically, that movement is triggered by the geometry of phrase structure. Assuming a minimalist framework, movement is

Distributed Reduplication (Linguistic In
โœ John Frampton ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐ŸŒ English

A convincing account of reduplicative phenomena has been a longstanding problem for rule-based theories of morphophonology. Many scholars believe that derivational phonology is incapable in principle of analyzing reduplication. In Distributed Reduplication, John Frampton demonstrates the adequacy of

Local Economy (Linguistic Inquiry Monogr
โœ Chris Collins ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› MIT ๐ŸŒ English

Following on from Noam Chomsky's "The Minimalist Program", this text deals in a general way with economy derivation and minimalism.

Provocative Syntax (Linguistic Inquiry M
โœ Phil Branigan ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› The MIT Press ๐ŸŒ English

Chomsky showed that no description of natural language syntax would be adequate without some notion of movement operations in a syntactic derivation. It now seems likely that such movement transformations are formally simple operations, in which a s