๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Barriers (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)

โœ Scribed by Noam Chomsky


Publisher
The MIT Press
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Leaves
113
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This monograph explores several complex questions concerning the theories of government and bounding, including, in particular, the possibility of a unified approach to these topics. Starting with the intuitive idea that certain categories in certain configurations are barriers to government and movement, it considers whether the same categories are barriers in the two instances or whether one barrier suffices to block government (a stricter and "more local" relation) while more than one barrier inhibits movement, perhaps in a graded manner.Any proposal concerning the formulation of the concept of government has intricate consequences, and many of the empirical phenomena that appear to be relevant are still poorly understood. Similarly, judgments about the theory of movement also involve a number of different factors, including sensitivity to lexical choice. Therefore, Chomsky proceeds on the basis of speculations as to the proper idealization of complex phenomena - how they should be sorted into a variety of interacting systems (some of which remain quite obscure), which may tentatively be put aside to be explained by independent (sometimes unknown) factors, and which may be considered relevant to the subsystems under investigation.Barriers considers several possible paths through the maze of possibilities that arise. It sets the subtheory context (x-bar theory, theory of movement, and government) for determining what constitutes a barrier and explores two concepts of barrier - maximal projection and the minimality condition - and their manifestations in and implications for proper government, subjacency, island violations, vacuous movement, parasitic gaps, and A-chains.Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT. Barriers is Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Cover......Page 1
Title......Page 4
ISBN......Page 5
Contents......Page 6
Series Foreword......Page 8
Acknowledgments......Page 9
Introductory Comments......Page 10
1 X-Bar Theory......Page 11
2 Theory of Movement......Page 13
3 Government......Page 17
4 Barriers......Page 19
5 Proper Government......Page 25
6 Subjacency......Page 37
7 Island Violations......Page 40
8 The Minimality Condition......Page 51
9 Vacuous Movement......Page 57
10 Parasitic Gaps......Page 63
11 A-Chains......Page 77
12 Some Further Problems......Page 89
13 Summary......Page 96
Notes......Page 100
References......Page 106
Index......Page 110


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Dynamic Antisymmetry (Linguistic Inquiry
โœ Andrea Moro ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐ŸŒ English

The central idea of Dynamic Antisymmetry is that movement and phrase structure are not independent properties of grammar; more specifically, that movement is triggered by the geometry of phrase structure. Assuming a minimalist framework, movement is

Uttering Trees (Linguistic Inquiry Monog
โœ Norvin Richards ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› The MIT Press ๐ŸŒ English

A study of the interface between syntax and phonology that seeks deeper explanations for such syntactic problems as case phenomena and the distribution of overt and covert wh-movement.

Distributed Reduplication (Linguistic In
โœ John Frampton ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐ŸŒ English

A convincing account of reduplicative phenomena has been a longstanding problem for rule-based theories of morphophonology. Many scholars believe that derivational phonology is incapable in principle of analyzing reduplication. In Distributed Reduplication, John Frampton demonstrates the adequacy of

Local Economy (Linguistic Inquiry Monogr
โœ Chris Collins ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› MIT ๐ŸŒ English

Following on from Noam Chomsky's "The Minimalist Program", this text deals in a general way with economy derivation and minimalism.

Provocative Syntax (Linguistic Inquiry M
โœ Phil Branigan ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› The MIT Press ๐ŸŒ English

Chomsky showed that no description of natural language syntax would be adequate without some notion of movement operations in a syntactic derivation. It now seems likely that such movement transformations are formally simple operations, in which a s