𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Use of the surfactant 3-(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethyl-ammoniapropane sulfonate in hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins

✍ Scribed by John J. Buckley; Donald B. Wetlaufer

Book ID
104144585
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
750 KB
Volume
464
Category
Article
ISSN
1873-3778

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Isocratic hydrophobic interaction chromatography of five proteins has been carried out using mobile phases containing the surfactant 3-(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammoniopropane sulfonate (CHAPS). Linear relationships were found between log k' and ammonium sulfate concentrations for all the proteins with CHAPS in the submicellar concentration range. The slope of such a plot decreases monotonically as CHAPS concentration is increased. To a first approximation, the effect of CHAPS on protein retention can be explained in terms of a competitive binding model. However, CHAPS does show differential effects on the elution of proteins, substantially altering selectivity. The use of a normalized capacity factor, k'/k'o, proves useful for comparing retention times of different proteins as a function of CHAPS concentration. The magnitudes of k'/kA were found to be inversely correlated with the slopes of plots of log k' VS. ammonium sulfate concentration in the absence of CHAPS. Adsorption isotherms for CHAPS were determined over the working range of ammonium sulfate. The binding of CHAPS to the SynChropak Propyl stationary phase and its effects on retention were found to be readily reversible. For each protein, plots of kl/k10 KS. surface concentration of CHAPS were superposable for data obtained at different salt concentrations. These findings support a competitive binding model. A simple geometric argument for stationary phase occupancy provides a qualitative explanation for the observed surfactant selectivity.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Influence of nonionic surfactants on the
Influence of nonionic surfactants on the chromatographic behaviour of proteins in hydrophobic interaction chromatography
✍ Marina D. Rukhadze; Maya V. Sebiskveradze; Teona G. Makharadze; Nino Sh. Sidamon 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

## Abstract The chromatographic characteristics of proteins in the presence of additives of nonionic surfactants Brij‐35 and Tween‐80 in the conditions of descending gradient of ammonium sulfate and phenyl‐coated polymeric stationary phase were investigated. It was revealed that retention factors o

On the use of mild hydrophobic interacti
On the use of mild hydrophobic interaction chromatography for “method scouting” protein purification strategies in aqueous two-phase systems: A study using model proteins
✍ J. G. Huddleston; R. Wang; A. Lyddiatt 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 914 KB

## Abstract The behavior of a series of pure proteins partitioned in aqueous two‐phase systems is compared with their behavior during mild hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC). A simple theoretical rationale for this comparison is presented based upon solvophobic theory. Similarities were f

The Use of Thermodynamics for the Indire
The Use of Thermodynamics for the Indirect Determination of Neutral Surfactants Activities in Mixtures of Potassium Polyvinyl Sulfate (PVSK), Dodecyltrimethylammonium Bromide (DTABr), andN-Dodecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate (SB12)
✍ Véronique Peyre; Pierre Letellier 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

Mixtures of zwitterionic and cationic surfactants were studied in the presence of an anionic polyelectrolyte. We used N-dodecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate (SB12), dodecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (DTA ؉ Br ؊ ), and polyvinyl sulfate (potassium salt) (PVS ؊ K ؉ ). The composition of t