𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Upper Bounds of the Spectral Radius of Graphs in Terms of Genus

✍ Scribed by Hong Yuan


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
149 KB
Volume
74
Category
Article
ISSN
0095-8956

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Let G be a simple graph with n vertices and orientable genus g and non-orientable genus h. Let (G) be the spectral radius of the adjacency matrix A of G. We obtain the following sharp bounds of (G): (1) (G) 1+-3n+12g&8; (2) (G) 1+-3n+6h&8.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the Spectral Radius and the Genus of
✍ H. Yuan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 205 KB

In this paper, we obtain a relation between the spectral radius and the genus of a graph. In particular, we give upper bounds on the spectral radius of graphs with \(n\) vertices and small genus. " " 1995 Academic Press. Ins

The Spectral Radius of Graphs on Surface
✍ M.N. Ellingham; Xiaoya Zha πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 152 KB

This paper provides new upper bounds on the spectral radius \ (largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix) of graphs embeddable on a given compact surface. Our method is to bound the maximum rowsum in a polynomial of the adjacency matrix, using simple consequences of Euler's formula. Let # denote th

On the spectral radius of a directed gra
✍ Kwapisz, Jaroslaw πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 314 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We provide upper estimates on the spectral radius of a directed graph. In particular w e prove that the spectral radius is bounded by the maximum of the geometric mean of in-degree and out-degree taken over all vertices.

New upper bounds on the decomposability
✍ Fedor V. Fomin; Dimitrios M. Thilikos πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 335 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract It is known that a planar graph on __n__ vertices has branch‐width/tree‐width bounded by $\alpha \sqrt {n}$. In many algorithmic applications, it is useful to have a small bound on the constant Ξ±. We give a proof of the best, so far, upper bound for the constant Ξ±. In particular, for th