𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Truth and Objectivity

✍ Scribed by Crispin Wright


Publisher
Harvard University Press
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Leaves
128
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Crispin Wright offers an original perspective on the place of "realism" in philosophical inquiry. He proposes a radically new framework for discussing the claims of the realists and the anti-realists. This framework rejects the classical "deflationary" conception of truth yet allows both disputants to respect the intuition that judgments, whose status they contest, are at least semantically fitted for truth and may often justifiably be regarded as true. In the course of his argument, Wright offers original critical discussions of many central concerns of philosophers interested in realism, including the "deflationary" conception of truth, internal realist truth, scientific realism and the theoreticity of observation, and the role of moral states of affairs in explanations of moral beliefs.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Truth and Objectivity
✍ Crispin Wright πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Harvard University Press 🌐 English

Crispin Wright offers an original perspective on the place of "realism" in philosophical inquiry. He proposes a radically new framework for discussing the claims of the realists and the anti-realists. This framework rejects the classical "deflationary" conception of truth yet allows both disputants

Truth and Objectivity
✍ Crispin Wright πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Harvard University Press 🌐 English

<p>Crispin Wright offers an original perspective on the place of β€œrealism” in philosophical inquiry. He proposes a radically new framework for discussing the claims of the realists and the anti-realists.</p>

Objectivity, Empiricism and Truth
✍ R. W. Newell πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

Originally published in 1986. Wittgenstein, William James, Thomas Kuhn and John Wisdom share an attitude towards problems in the theory of knowledge which is fundamentally in conflict with the empiricist tradition. They encourage the idea that in understanding the central concepts of epistemology –