๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Trisomy 16 and trisomy 16 mosaicism: A review

โœ Scribed by Benn, Peter


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
104 KB
Volume
79
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-7299

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A review of all prenatal and postnatal diagnoses of trisomy 16 and trisomy 16 mosaicism was carried out in the context of the current understanding of confined placental mosaicism and uniparental disomy (UPD). The prenatal detection of trisomy 16 cells is associated with a high probability of fetal death, preterm delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and fetal anomalies. Birth defects were typical of those seen in nonmosaic partial duplications of chromosome 16. Surprisingly, anomalies were sometimes limited to a single organ and included some relatively common isolated defects such as a ventricular septal defect, hypospadias, imperforate anus, inguinal hernia, and clubfoot. The risk for abnormality appeared to be higher in those pregnancies in which trisomy 16 cells were identified in amniotic fluid compared to the detection in chorionic villi samples. Contrary to nonmosaic trisomy 16 with an excess of males, mosaic trisomy 16 shows an excess of female karyotypes. Following the prenatal detection of trisomy 16 cells, aneuploid cells are almost never found in fetal or neonatal lymphocytes. Studies on fibroblasts also often fail to confirm the presence of the abnormal cell line even in cases in which multiple anomalies are present. It is likely that trisomy 16 cells are sometimes present in the early developing embryo even though subsequent cytogenetic studies on fetal or neonatal tissues may not detect any aneuploid cells. UPD can be excluded as a mechanism for those anomalies that are common to mosaic trisomy 16 and nonmosaic partial duplications. The term ''occult mosaicism'' is suggested to describe the situation in which the presence of an abnormal cell line is suspected on the basis of clinical data but un-proven by laboratory analysis. Am.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Two cases of trisomy 16 mosaicism ascert
โœ Claudine Rieubland; David Francis; Leonie Houben; Sylvea Corrie; Agnes Bankier; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 103 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Postnatally ascertained trisomy 16 mosaicism is a rare diagnosis, with only three reported cases to date with no defined clinical phenotype. Trisomy 16 mosaicism diagnosed prenatally is common and associated with variable pregnancy outcomes ranging from stillbirth with multiple congenit

TRISOMY 16 MOSAICISM IN AMNIOTIC FLUID C
โœ UMADEVI TANTRAVAHI; CAROLYN MATSUMOTO; JUDITH DELACH; ALICIA CRAFFEY; JAMES SMEL ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 618 KB

Trisomy 16 mosaicism was found in amniotic fluid cells in a patient undergoing amniocentesis because of elevated second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) (2.80 MOM), a markedly elevated human chorionic gonadotropin level (hCG) (12.02 MOM), and a Down syndrome risk of 1:55. Ultrasoun

Ectopia cordis in a fetus with mosaic tr
โœ Christos Arnaoutoglou; Soultana Meditskou; Anastasia Keivanidou; Marilena Mantho ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 288 KB

## Abstract Ectopia cordis and mosaic trisomy 16 are two rare fetal anomalies, which have not been reported in association. We report a case of an isolated ectopia cordis at 11^+3^ weeks. Subsequent embryological examination confirmed thoracic ectopia cordis with normal heart structure and array co

Trisomy 14 mosaicism: Case report and re
โœ Johnson, Virginia Pineda ;Aceto, Thomas ;Likness, Clark ;Hoehn, Holger ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 444 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Mosaic trisomy 22: A case presentation a
โœ Hirschhorn, Kurt ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 855 B ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

I have read with great interest the paper by Crowe et al. [1997]. It is an excellent clinical and cytogenetic review of trisomy 22 in its various manifestations. I only wish to point out that the first proven case (by G-banding) of trisomy 22 appeared in 1973, in a paper in which we demonstrated the