𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Treatment of breast carcinoma in patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes using radiotherapy versus axillary dissection

✍ Scribed by Naoko Fujimoto; Atsushi Amemiya; Makoto Kondo; Atsuya Takeda; Naoyuki Shigematsu


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
101 KB
Volume
101
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of axillary lymph node dissection (AxD) for patients with breast carcinoma who have clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) and undergo breast‐conserving therapy has been controversial. If patients do not undergo AxD, then it is uncertain whether specific lymph node irradiation should be given. The authors compared the results obtained from patients w ho underwent AxD with the results from patients who received axillary irradiation (AxR) using one of two radiotherapy techniques.

METHODS

Patients with T1–T2cN0 breast carcinoma were treated from 1983 to 2002 with either AxD (80 patients) or AxR (1134 patients received tangential‐field [2‐field] irradiation, and 303 patients received 3‐field irradiation). The median follow‐up was 161 months for the AxD group and 66 months for the AxR group (55 months for patients who received tangential‐field irradiation, and 122 months for patients who received 3‐field irradiation).

RESULTS

One patient in the AxD group and 35 patients in the AxR group had axillary recurrences. The 10‐year cumulative axillary recurrence rates were 1.3% and 4.6% for the AxD group and the AxR group, respectively (P = 0.21). For patients with T1 tumors, the 10‐year overall survival rates for the two groups were 94.7% and 92.7%, respectively (P = 0.34); and, for patients with T2 tumors, the 10‐year overall survival rates were 92.5% and 89.1%, respectively (P = 0.34). In the AxR group, the 5‐year axillary recurrence rates were 2.5% for patients who received tangential‐field irradiation and 1.7% for patients who received 3‐field irradiation (P = 0.18), and the 5‐year regional recurrence rates for the two groups were 4.8% and 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, positive lymphovascular invasion, outer tumor location, and larger tumor size were significant risk factors for regional failure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with cN0 breast carcinoma, AxD and AxR yielded the same overall survival rates. Most patients can be treated safely with tangential‐field irradiation alone. Patients who are at increased risk of regional failure may benefit from three‐field irradiation. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Primary axillary radiotherapy as axillar
✍ Frank J. P. Hoebers; Jacques H. Borger; Augustinus A. M. Hart; Johannes L. Peter 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB 👁 2 views

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity of primary axillary radiotherapy in breast-conserving therapy for postmenopausal, clinically axillary lymph node negative patients with early stage breast carcinoma. Between 1983-1997, 105 patients with clinically neg

Morbidity following sentinel lymph node
✍ Peter Schrenk; Roman Rieger; Andreas Shamiyeh; Wolfgang Wayand 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB 👁 1 views

Axillary lymph node dissection for staging the axilla in breast carcinoma patients is associated with considerable morbidity, such as edema of the arm, pain, sensory disturbances, impairment of arm mobility, and shoulder stiffness. Sentinel lymph node biopsy electively removes the first lymph node,

Optimal use of sentinel lymph node biops
✍ Sandra L. Wong; Troy D. Abell; Celia Chao; Michael J. Edwards; Kelly M. McMaster 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB 👁 1 views

## Background: There are no data available from randomized controlled trials that compare the efficacy of sentinel lymph node (sln) biopsy with level i/ii axillary lymph node dissection (alnd) in patients with breast carcinoma. we performed a formal decision analysis to determine whether sln biopsy