## Abstract Innovative behavior is increasingly important for organizations' survival. Transformational leadership, in contrast to transactional leadership, has been argued to be particularly effective in engendering follower innovative behavior. However, empirical evidence for this relationship is
Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance
β Scribed by Bruce J. Avolio; Weichun Zhu; William Koh; Puja Bhatia
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 127 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.283
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Using a sample of 520 staff nurses employed by a large public hospital in Singapore, we examined whether psychological empowerment mediated the effects of transformational leadership on followers' organizational commitment. We also examined how structural distance (direct and indirect leadership) between leaders and followers moderated the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Results from HLM analyses showed that psychological empowerment mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Similarly, structural distance between the leader and follower moderated the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Implications for research and practice of our findings are discussed. Copyright Β© 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This study examines the relationship between psychological empowerment and leadership. Empowered supervisors are hypothesized to be innovative, upward inΒ―uencing, and inspirational and less focused on monitoring to maintain the status quo. Tested on a sample of mid-level supervisors from a Fortune 5
## Abstract Although the value of a supportive organizational climate has been recognized over the years, there is a need for better understanding of its relationship with employee outcomes. This study investigates whether the recently emerging core construct of positive psychological capital (cons
## Abstract Research on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and affective organizational commitment (AC) has primarily adopted a social exchange perspective. In this study we considered complementary socioβemotional explanations of the POSβAC relationship. We focused on