𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Transdifferentiation—fact or artifact

✍ Scribed by Ying Liu; Mahendra S. Rao


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
286 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-2312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Normal development appears to involve a progressive restriction in developmental potential. However, recent evidence suggests that this progressive restriction is not irreversible and can be altered to reveal novel phenotypic potentials of stem, progenitor, and even differentiated cells. While some of these results can be explained by the presence of contaminating cell populations, persistence of pluripotent stem cells, cell fusion, etc., several examples exist that are difficult to explain as anything other than “true transdifferentiation” and/or dedifferentiation. These examples of transdifferentiation are best explained by understanding how the normal process of progressive cell fate restriction occurs during development. We suggest that subversion of epigenetic controls regulating cell type specific gene expression likely underlies the process of transdifferentiation and it may be possible to identify specific factors to control the transdifferentiation process. We predict, however, that transdifferentiation will not be reliable or reproducible and will probably require complex manipulations. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Metal-Free Haloperoxidases: Fact or Arti
✍ Ole Kirk; Lars Sparre Conrad 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB

Lipases can catalyze halogenations (see scheme for an example) under the same experimental conditions as "metal-free haloperoxidases". This activity should, therefore, not be attributed to a new unique class of enzymes, or even to metal-free haloperoxidases, but should rather be regarded as a side a

Carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene: fa
✍ D. Henschler; E. Eder; T. Neudecker; M. Metzler 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 187 KB

Technical trichloroethylene has been found carcinogenic in mice after high daily doses per os. A GC-MS analysis of this technical sample revealed the presence of considerable amounts of epichlorohydrin and 1.2-epoxibutane as stabilizers. These epoxides are highly mutagenic in the Ames test and are,