𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Toxicokinetic analysis of losartan during gestation and lactation in the rat

✍ Scribed by Spence, S. G.; Zacchei, A. G.; Lee, L. L.; Baldwin, C. L.; Berna, R. A.; Mattson, B. A.; Eydelloth, R. S.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
695 KB
Volume
53
Category
Article
ISSN
0040-3709

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Previous developmental and reproductive toxicity studies in rats with losartan, a potent AT1-selective angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist, correlated maternal treatment during gestation day (GD) 15-20 with irreversible renal abnormalities in the F1 generation (Spence et al., '95a,b). Continued treatment through lactation was also associated with increases in pup mortality and decreases in pup body weights that persisted through weaning. The studies presented here were undertaken to quantify fetal and neonatal exposure to losartan when administered to the dam by oral gavage during early gestation, late gestation, and lactation. Following daily oral dosing of 135 mg/kg/day on GD6-15, fetal drug levels were negligible. However, losartan and its active metabolite, EXP3174 (L-158,641) were readily detectable in fetal plasma on GD 20 (estimated AUC values, 50.70 and 167.70 micrograms/hr/ml, respectively) and maternal milk during lactation (1.61 and 1.67 micrograms/ml, respectively). These studies suggest that the relative increased sensitivity of the fetus as compared to the neonate for losartan-induced renal lesions is related to the degree of exposure which is dependent on the time of administration (early gestation vs. late gestation/lactation) and the route of exposure (transplacental or through the milk). Furthermore, the maximum exposure to losartan and EXP3174 correlates with the ontogeny of the renin angiotensin system on approximately GD 17 and the critical period for losartan-induced renal lesions (GD15-20). The data support the hypothesis that the observed adverse fetal and neonatal effects are pharmacologically mediated, presumably through the lack of AT1 receptor stimulation.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effects of litter size during gestat
✍ Dr. Francine Wehmer; Kai-Lin Catherine Jen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 464 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Physiological and behavioral development of rats was affected by prenatal nutrition and postnatal litter size. Prenatal nutrition was manipulated by combining differences in maternal nutrition with variation of prenatal litter size produced by pre‐mating isolation of 1 uterine horn. The

Maternal caffeine intake during gestatio
✍ A.M. Lorenzo; D. LeΓ³n; C.A. Castillo; M.A. Ruiz; J.L. Albasanz; M. MartΓ­n πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 176 KB

## Abstract Even though caffeine can be excreted in breast milk, few studies have analyzed the effect of maternal caffeine consumption during lactation on neonatal brain. In the present work pregnant rats were treated daily with 1 g/L of caffeine in their drinking water during pregnancy and/or lact

Comparison of bone loss during normal la
✍ Miller, Scott C. ;Bowman, Beth M. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 276 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Background: Substantial changes in mineral and skeletal metabolism occur during pregnancy and lactation. The purpose of this study was to compare three contrasting osteopenic states in the rat: (1) physiological (lactation), (2) endocrine-deficiency (ovariectomy), and (3) lack of mechanical usage (i