## Abstract This special issue showcases papers by four sets of authors who share opinions about specific things that should be done for the field of organizational psychology to prosper. To begin, Lefkowitz argues that practitioners should embrace a more humanistic set of values. Second, Cascio su
To prosper, organizational psychology should … overcome methodological barriers to progress
✍ Scribed by Jeffrey R. Edwards
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 181 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.529
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Progress in organizational psychology (OP) research depends on the rigor and quality of the methods we use. This paper identifies ten methodological barriers to progress and offers suggestions for overcoming the barriers, in part or whole. The barriers address how we derive hypotheses from theories, the nature and scope of the questions we pursue in our studies, the ways we address causality, the manner in which we draw samples and measure constructs, and how we conduct statistical tests and draw inferences from our research. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating research methods into our ongoing development goals as scholars and framing methods as tools that help us achieve shared objectives in our field. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Academics and practitioners differ on so many dimensions that researchers have described them as living in different “thought worlds.” That gap persists, and there are important explanations for it, but a confluence of economic and organizational forces is driving academics and practiti
## Abstract We argue that for the field of organizational psychology to prosper, it must adopt a global perspective. In this article, we discuss three specific ideals for a more global organizational psychology, our progress toward these ideals (or lack thereof), and potential solutions to move tow
## Abstract The values of organizational psychology are criticized as (a) having supplanted psychology's humanist tradition and societal responsibilities with corporate economic objectives; (b) being “scientistic” in perpetuating the notion of value‐free science while ignoring that it is business v