## Abstract The problem of designing a controller, which results in a closedβloop system response with optimal timeβdomain characteristics, is considered. In the approach presented in this paper, the controller order is fixed (higher than poleβplacement order) and we seek a controller that results
Time optimal design of discrete data systems in the frequency domain
β Scribed by P.V. Rao; P.A. Janakiraman
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1974
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 296 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0005-1098
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Tbe main objective of any time optimal design is to develop a control law to drive the state variables of the system, from a given set of initial values to a desired set of final values. Sometimes, it is required to drive the systems such that the output for a unit step input is reached in a minimum time, without overshoot [5][6][7]. Although the problem is normally set in the frequency domain, it is usual to convert it into the time domain for determining the optimal control sequence. It is shown in the paper that the entire time optimal design can be effectively carried out if the transfer function of the plant is given in the Z domain.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The frequency domain approach to linear quadratic optimal control design has been widely investigated in the past. Wiener -Hopf linear quadratic optimal design has been discussed thoroughly by Chang. 1 However, the imbedded plant is restricted to be stable and minimum phase. The problem is resolved
In this communication a new design method for the discrete-time LQ regulator based on the solution of the inverse optimal regulator is presented. The main feature of the method is that it requires no Riccati solution in addition to having a number of tuning parameters which help to shape a desirable
The frequency domain design of robust feedback control systems involves the fitting of a designable complex function of frequency to specification/uncertainty derived constraints. At present there are two basically different approaches to these problems: the gain versus frequency approaches and the