๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues

โœ Scribed by James V. Wertsch


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
672 KB
Volume
1984
Category
Article
ISSN
1520-3247

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


As the work reported in this volume shows, Vygotsky's notion of the zone of proximal development has recently spurred a great deal of interest among developmental and cognitive psychologists. His ideas have been incorporated into studies on a variety of issues, including intelligence testing (for example, Brown and Ferrara, in press; and the chapter by Campione, Brown, Ferrara, and Bryant in this volume), memory (for example, Rogoff and Gardner, in press), and problem solving (for example, Wertsch, 1979; Wertsch and others, 1980).

As we come to consider more and more psychological phenomena from the perspective of the zone of proximal development, it becomes increasingly important to explicate this theoretical construct. Failure to do so raises the risk that it will be used loosely and indiscriminately, thereby becoming so amorphous that it loses all explanatory power. In what follows, I shall identify some aspects of Vygotsky's account of the zone of proximal development that are in need of clarification, and I shall undertake this clarification by extending his ideas in light of contemporary theoretical and empirical research. This chapter is based on a presentation at the biennual meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit, 1983. B. RngoI1. ,] V . Wertrch (Edr.) Chddrrni Lmrnin,c in rhr 'Zonc of R o x t m l &wlopmml "


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Science teachers' conceptual growth with
โœ M. Gail Jones; Melissa J. Rua; Glenda Carter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 192 KB

Within a sociocultural context, this study examined how science teachers' knowledge of science and science pedagogy changed as a result of participating in a constructivist-based graduate science methods course. Fourteen elementary and middle school science teachers worked with an assigned partner f