𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences and learning

✍ Scribed by Joseph C. Campione; Ann L. Brown; Roberta A. Ferrara; Nancy R. Bryant


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
741 KB
Volume
1984
Category
Article
ISSN
1520-3247

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The zone of proximal development: Some c
✍ James V. Wertsch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 672 KB

As the work reported in this volume shows, Vygotsky's notion of the zone of proximal development has recently spurred a great deal of interest among developmental and cognitive psychologists. His ideas have been incorporated into studies on a variety of issues, including intelligence testing (for ex

Gender, ethnicity, development, and risk
✍ Nancy Darling; G. Anne Bogat; Timothy A. Cavell; Susan Elaine Murphy; Bernadette πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 139 KB

## Abstract Individual differences shape the needs and characteristics of protΓ©gΓ©s, the processes through which mentoring may influence protΓ©gΓ©s' developmental trajectories, and the social networks into which the mentors enter. The literature on the influences of gender, ethnicity, and age on mento

Individual differences in generalization
✍ Leslie J. Carver πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 46 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Jones and Herbert describe research on deferred imitation and how this research reflects on the development of explicit memory in infancy. The article raises several interesting questions about how the medial temporal lobe memory system develops. In this commentary, I discuss some of the additional

The Worldview Dimensions of Individualis
✍ Bryant Williams πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› American Counseling Association 🌐 English βš– 144 KB

A recent article, β€œRethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta‐Analyses” (D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon, & M. Kemmelmeier, 2002), revealed that 170 studies have been conducted on the worldview dimensions of individualism and collectivism. The authors' analyses