✦ LIBER ✦

The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test condemned

✍ Scribed by J. Ludbrook

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 275 KB
Volume: 83
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-1323
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830155

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Mann-Whitney Test

✍ Danny P. Wallace 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 38 KB 👁 1 views

Evaluation of Noether's Method of Sample

Evaluation of Noether's Method of Sample Size Determination for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test

✍ Dr. Rüdiger Vollandt; Dr. Manfred Horn 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 369 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract NOETHER (1987) proposed a method of sample size determination for the Wilcoxon‐Mann‐Whitney test. To obtain a sample size formula, he restricted himself to alternatives that differ only slightly from the null hypothesis, so that the unknown variance o^2^ of the Mann‐Whitney statistic ca

Using the Mann-Whitney test on informetr

Using the Mann-Whitney test on informetric data

✍ John C. Huber; Roland Wagner-Döbler 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB 👁 1 views

An Algorithm for the Mann-Whitney U-Test

✍ Dipl.Math. P. M. Pittner 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 121 KB 👁 1 views

On an Unbiased Variance Estimator for th

On an Unbiased Variance Estimator for the WILCOXON-MANN-WHITNEY-Statistic Based on Ranks

✍ Dr. R. Hilgers 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 320 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract For some applications of the WILCOXON‐MANN‐WHITNEY‐statistic its variance has to be estimated. So e.g. for the test of POTTHOFF (1963) to detect differences in medians of two symmetric distributions as well as for the computation of approximate, confidence bounds for the probability __P

Use of the Mann–Whitney U-test for clust

Use of the Mann–Whitney U-test for clustered data

✍ B. Rosner; D. Grove 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 233 KB 👁 2 views

The Mann}Whitney ;-test is ubiquitous in statistical practice for the comparison of measures of location for two samples where the assumption of normality is questionable. Frequently, one has replicate data for each individual in a group and would like to compare measures of central tendency between