𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The utility of the Kaufman assessment battery for children (K-ABC) and the wechsler intelligence scales for linguistically different children: Clinical considerations

✍ Scribed by Rosemary Flanagan

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
498 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
0033-3085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Convergent and discriminant validity of
Convergent and discriminant validity of the mental processing scales of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
✍ Eric J. Cooley; Robert Ayres πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 361 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Western Oregon State College Convergent and discriminant validity of the Mental Processing Scales of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were examined using 51 first-grade children. Convergent validity was assessed using the Reading Recognition and Comprehension subtests of the

The relationship between the Wechsler In
The relationship between the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement
✍ Claire Lavin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 326 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## College of New Rochelle The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-111; Wechsler, 1991) and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1985) are commonly used in the identification of children for special educational services. However, there is

Comparison of the Kaufman Brief Intellig
Comparison of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Childrenβ€”third edition in economically disadvantaged African American youth
✍ Judy Johnson Grados; Kathleen A. Russo-Garcia πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 54 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1990) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III; Wechsler, 1991) are compared in 35 economically disadvantaged African American youth presenting for treatment in a community mental health setting. Significa