The use of support energy in the meat processing industry
β Scribed by J. Keith Jacques; Kenneth L. Blaxter
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 604 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5142
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
A study of the consumption of support energy in the meat industry in Scotland involved both large meat factories and βhigh streetβ butchers. The energy cost of transport of live animals from farms to abattoirs was 0.5 Γ 10^9^ J/ton deboned meat for both pigs and cattle. Factory slaughtering, butchery and processing costs were 60 Γ 10^9^ J/ton deboned meat for pigs and 41 Γ 109 J/ton for cattle. When onβfarm costs are included the support energy subsidy/ton meat was similar for both species at 110 Γ 10^9^ J/ton deboned meat. The energy subsidy incurred in meat factories/ton deboned meat varied with the extent of processing, from 27 Γ 10^9^ J/ton for jointed pork to 86 Γ 10^9^ J for beef pies containing 34% meat. The imparting of convenience to food was achieved by expending additional labour and support energy in the ratio 4 Γ 10^9^ J/man hour. Separate calculations showed that maintenance of hygiene and disposal of effluent accounted for over half the total energy cost of factory operations.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract All industrially significant actinides have hazards associated with their storage and handling. All are radioactive and potentially fissile which limits the amount of material that can be processed in a given unit operation to prevent a criticality accident. To protect workers from the
An investigation has been made to see whether it is possible to use crossflow filtration on a technical scale instead of centrifugal separators for the separation of bacteria from fermentation broth and celldebris from a suspension of desintegrated bacteria. It was shown that it is very likely that
Participatory ergonomics teams from two departments ( f a pork slaughtering plant analvzed musculoskeletal hazards and proposed ergonomics solutions for several jobs in the plant. The jobs were targeted based on associution with ( I large number o f injuries, one or more partic:irlarly severe injuri