The objective of this study was to ascertain if the observed differences in strength behaviour of blast-furnace and foundry cokes could be attributed to the different carbonizing conditions used in their production. Two coal blends, one being representative for blast-furnace coke production and the other for foundry coke production, were carbonized in a small-scale test oven using a wide range of heating conditions which included those used in the industrial production of the two types of coke. Coke tensile strengths were determined by the diametrical-compression test and a small-scale drum test was used to derive strength indices comparable to standard micum indices. The tensile strengths and material constants obtained by Weibull statistical analysis, when related to those drum-test indices which assess the resistance of coke to attrition and to corresponding data for equivalent commercial cokes, demonstrated that the cokes fell into two distinct sets according to the coal blend used. It was concluded that changes in coke strength caused by different carbonizing conditions could not account for the different strength behaviour of blast-furnace and foundry cokes.
The alternative hypothesis that the nature of the coal blend is the predominant factor is supported by the correlations established for each of the coal blends.