𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The significance of comorbidity in advanced laryngeal cancer

✍ Scribed by Amy Y. Chen; Leslie K. Matson; Dianna Roberts; Helmuth Goepfert


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
336 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Introduction

Cancer patients often have concurrent diseases and conditions known as comorbidities. The aim of this project is to demonstrate the significance of comorbidity in the treatment and outcomes of advanced laryngeal carcinoma.

Methods

A retrospective medical record review of 182 patients with previously untreated T3 or T4 squamous carcinomas of the larynx treated at M. D. Anderson between 1990 and 1995 was performed. Demographic, patient‐specific, tumor‐specific, and outcome measures information were collected. Comorbidity was coded using the Modified Medical Comorbidity Index. Univariate and multivariate analysis with the use of life survival analysis techniques and logistic regression were performed.

Results

The median age at diagnosis was 59.5 years. Most patients were men (69.2%) and Caucasian (73.1%). Laryngeal preservation was performed in 90 patients, and surgical resection was performed in 92 patients. Patients in the two treatment groups had similar comorbidity, locoregional control (65%), and 5‐year survival (37.3%). Patients with either moderate or severe comorbidity had significantly worse overall survival (p = .00014) and worse 5‐year survival than those with no or mild comorbidity (21.8% vs 46.3%, p = .003).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that comorbidity is significantly associated with survival in a group of patients with identical histology, site, and stage. Comorbid status should be incorporated into the assessment of prognosis and outcome to improve and optimize the management of head and neck cancer patients. Β© 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 566–572, 2001.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Informed consent in advanced laryngeal c
✍ Robert L. Foote; Paul D. Brown; Yolanda I. Garces; Scott H. Okuno; Robert C. Mil πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 189 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between the informed consent process and the treatment received by patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. ## Methods. The study group was composed of 101 consecutive patients who were eligible for the Department of Ve

Impact of comorbidity on the outcome of
✍ Vinidh Paleri; Richard G. Wight; Gareth R. Davies πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 99 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. Comorbidity has been shown to be a determinant in treatment selection and survival in various cancers. We have previously shown that the Adult Comorbidity Evaluationβ€”27 index is applicable in a United Kingdom setting, and the process of comorbidity grading by retrospecti

Recent changes in the treatment of patie
✍ Eric M. Genden; Alfio Ferlito; Alessandra Rinaldo; Carl E. Silver; Johannes J. F πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 119 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Since the original data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group demonstrated that nonsurgical therapy could achieve survival rates comparable to total laryngectomy in selected cases, there has been a progressive increase in employment of nonsurgical therapy

Prognostic significance of Bcl-2 and p53
✍ Michael Friedman; Jessica W. Lim; Ernie Manders; Adam D. Schaffner; Gary L. Kirs πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 79 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background Proteins regulating the cell cycle and cell death are frequently abnormally expressed in cancer. Several of these, particularly p53 and Bcl‐2, have been widely suggested as possible prognostic markers in diverse human malignancies. Their role in predicting outcome in squa