## Abstract Citation and content analyses of eight American Chemical Society (ACS) journals in a range of fields of chemistry were used to describe the use of Webβbased information resources by the authors and readers of the scholarly literature of chemistry. The analyses indicate that even though
The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication
β Scribed by Franz Barjak
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 325 KB
- Volume
- 57
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1532-2882
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The present analysis looks at how scientists use the Internet for informal scientific communication. It investigates the relationship between several explanatory variables and Internet use in a crossβsection of scientists from seven European countries and five academic disciplines (astronomy, chemistry, computer science, economics, and psychology). The analysis confirmed some of the results of previous U.S.βbased analyses. In particular, it corroborated a positive relationship between research productivity and Internet use. The relationship was found to be nonlinear, with very productive (nonproductive) scientists using the Internet less (more) than would be expected according to their productivity. Also, being involved in collaborative R&D and having large networks of collaborators is associated with increased Internet use. In contrast to older studies, the analysis did not find any equalizing effect whereby higher Internet use rates help to overcome the problems of potentially disadvantaged researchers. Obviously, everybody who wants to stay at the forefront of research and keep upβtoβdate with developments in their research fields has to use the Internet.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Spom, J. V., B SHONTZ, F. C. (1984). Drug-induced ego states. I. Cocaine: Phenomenology and implica-TREWIUCK, L., B HOSCH, H. M. (1978). MMPI correlates of drug addiction based on drug of choice.
The Internet (the net) and World Wide Web (the web) Makedon, & Rebelsky, 1995). The cost of production and have grown rapidly in the past decade and have come dissemination of digital publications is also substantially to play a major role in supporting discourse and publicalower than that of paper
Electronic publishing opportunities, manifested today in a variety of electronic journals and Web-based compendia, have captured the imagination of many scholars. These opportunities have also destabilized norms about the character of legitimate scholarly publishing in some fields. Unfortunately, mu