is important in scholarship, where the timeliness publishing of scholarly research (Amiran, Orr, & Unsand relevance of publications are crucial to the advancement of knowledge. Although considerable space is de- worth, 1991; Landow & Delany, 1993
Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing
β Scribed by Kling, Rob ;McKim, Geoffrey
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 108 KB
- Volume
- 50
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0002-8231
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Electronic publishing opportunities, manifested today in a variety of electronic journals and Web-based compendia, have captured the imagination of many scholars. These opportunities have also destabilized norms about the character of legitimate scholarly publishing in some fields. Unfortunately, much of the literature about scholarly e-publishing homogenizes the character of publishing. This article provides an analytical approach for evaluating disciplinary conventions and for proposing policies about scholarly e-publishing. We characterize three dimensions of scholarly publishing as a communicative practice-publicity, access, and trustworthiness-and examine several forms of paper and electronic publications in this framework. This analysis shows how the common claim that e-publishing "substantially expands access" is oversimplified. It also indicates how peer reviewing (whether in paper or electronically) provides valuable functions for scholarly communication that are not effectively replaced by self-posting articles in electronic media.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
First ofall, the overall sequencing of chapters could have been better thought out. The sequencing of chapters does not follow the T/worJ', .4rchitw-(~lrc~, [~nd lpp/i[u/i~vl,\ theme set up by the book's subtitle. There does not appear to be any logical ordering of the chapters. The three separate
With the exception of a few experimental projects, peer-plunging costs for producers and consumers. These have reviewed electronic journals (ejournals) have been in exled to, among other developments, the dramatic explosion istence for only about ten years. The purpose of this of the Internet, espec
Recent years have seen a proliferation of electronic journals across academic disciplines. Electronic journals offer many advantages to multiple constituencies, however, their acceptance by faculty and university promotion and tenure committees is unclear. This research examines perceptions of facul
## Abstract The present analysis looks at how scientists use the Internet for informal scientific communication. It investigates the relationship between several explanatory variables and Internet use in a crossβsection of scientists from seven European countries and five academic disciplines (astr