The role of negative features in joint and separate evaluation
β Scribed by Martijn C. Willemsen; Gideon Keren
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 135 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3257
- DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.476
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Separate and joint evaluations differ in the manner in which attribute information is processed. We propose that negative attributes weigh more in separate compared to joint ratings. To assess the relative weights of positive and negative attributes, stimuli were employed containing mixed attribute valence, with good and poor attributes. In three experiments it was demonstrated empirically that, using such mixed valence options, the negative attributes indeed weighed more than the positive ones in separate compared to joint ratings. Direct evidence for the increased weight of negative attributes in separate ratings was provided by showing preference shifts between joint and separate ratings for options with mixed attribute valence. Copyright Β© 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A crossβcase analysis of four National Science Foundation (NSF) case studies identified both unique details and common themes related to promoting the use and influence of multisite evaluations. The analysis provided evidence of diverse evaluation use by stakeholders and suggested that
## Abstract By referring to different stages of an attribution process, this study examines how source credibility effects and opposing effects of negative information in twoβsided messages can be disentangled. The findings show that disclosure uniqueness (i.e., whether disclosures in a twoβsided m
Eosinophilic gastroenteropathy (EG) features gastrointestinal symptoms associated with variable eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract, particularly of the stomach and the small intestine. Since the first reported case of EG in 1937,l more than 150 cases have been reported in the li