## Abstract C.R. Snyder and T.R. Elliott's proposed model (this issue) represents a good effort toward reexamining the premises of clinical psychology education. However, there are several concepts left underdeveloped and inadequately defined. Furthermore, their ideas for improving clinical trainin
The return of science to education in clinical psychology: A reply to Snyder and Elliott
β Scribed by Kevin L. Rand
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 57 KB
- Volume
- 61
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Clinical psychology currently exists in a state of isolation from the other scientific domains. This disconnect is explained, in part, by the continued adherence to mindβbody dualism by many clinical psychologists and the rift between researchers and practitioners within the discipline. However, natural science researchers are reasserting the connection between physical and biological properties and psychological phenomena. As a result, knowledge and skill pertaining to the scientific method will become increasingly important in the education of future clinical psychologists. Modifications to both undergraduate and graduate training are suggested. Β© 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Norris and Kvernbekk (1997) deal with questions which arguably should be central to the field of science education: namely, what constitutes normative goal-directed theories in science education and what bearing does the nature of normative goal-directed educational theories have on their applica
is a former student of both Karl Popper and Ludwig Wittgenstein. The two philosophers had one encounter that was brief and stormy ("the poker incident"). For years, Munz tried heroically to continue alone their unbegun dialogue and make their ghosts join together fruitfully. This book is a fascinati
## Abstract Originally published in J Clin Psychol 61: 1201β1207, 2005 Through an oversight on the part of Special Issue CoβEditor Scott O. Lilienfeld, Dr. Joel Weinberger was not listed as a coβauthor of the article βIn Praise of Clinical Judgment: Meehl's Forgotten Legacy,β in the Introduction (