𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The response of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to chemotictic stimulation for smokers and non-smokers

✍ Scribed by J. H. Kraal; E. B. Kenney


Book ID
111260567
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1979
Tongue
English
Weight
620 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-3484

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The risk of coronary heart disease in no
✍ K. Stephen Brown πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 85 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

I appreciate the opportunity to respond to Professor Gross, since it seems, from his reply, that several things may not have been clear in my original rejoinder. However, before beginning, it is worth mentioning that another prospective study of CHD and ETS exposure recently appeared (Kawachi et al.

The chemokinetic response of psoriatic a
✍ F. M. Cunningham; E. Wong; P. M. Woollard; M. W. Greaves πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 338 KB

Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) from ten patients with chronic stable plaque psoriasis, five of whom had more than 40% skin involvement and five with less than 20% involvement, responded in a dose-related fashion to stimulation with the arachidonic acid lipoxygenase products 5- and 12-hydroxyeico

The role of nicotine content information
✍ Christine Darredeau; Sean P. Barrett πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 121 KB

## Abstract ## Objective A growing body of evidence suggests that non‐pharmacological factors may play an important role in smoking cessation outcomes using nicotine replacement therapies. This study examined the role of information about nicotine content in smokers' subjective responses to nicoti

The risk of coronary heart disease in no
✍ Alan J. Gross πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 88 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

This response is in two parts. First, the critique of Ellison and Morrison (1998) is addressed. This is followed, then, by addressing Brown's (1998) criticisms. While I am appreciative of the eorts put forth in these rejoinders to Gross (1998), I cannot, in any good