I appreciate the opportunity to respond to Professor Gross, since it seems, from his reply, that several things may not have been clear in my original rejoinder. However, before beginning, it is worth mentioning that another prospective study of CHD and ETS exposure recently appeared (Kawachi et al.
The risk of coronary heart disease in non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke revisited: response to Ellison and Morrison and to Brown
โ Scribed by Alan J. Gross
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 88 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1180-4009
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This response is in two parts. First, the critique of Ellison and Morrison (1998) is addressed. This is followed, then, by addressing Brown's (1998) criticisms. While I am appreciative of the eorts put forth in these rejoinders to Gross (1998), I cannot, in any good
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article addresses the controversial issue of whether non-smokers' exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) increases their risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD). Glantz and Parmley purport to provide toxicological and epidemiologic evidence in support of their contention that non
This article addresses the claim by Gross in this issue that estimates of coronary heart disease deaths due to environmental tobacco smoke are indefensible. Gross's interpretation of his data is questioned on statistical inference grounds. The three new studies which he introduces are discussed and
The author of the tobacco industry funded article `The risk of coronary heart disease in nonsmokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke' argues that previous studies have noted an association because they failed to adjust for confounders, and that the results of three previously unpublished cohor