๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The relative efficiency of the gold and treasury bill futures markets

โœ Scribed by Margaret A. Monroe; Richard A. Cohn


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
989 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


his article examines the pricing efficiency of the gold futures market relative T to the Treasury bill futures market. Futures contracts for gold, a relative newcomer, have only been traded since 1975. T-bill futures contracts, also a relative newcomer, have been traded on organized exchanges since 1976.

To the extent that prices for different delivery dates on the gold contract should reflect some interest rate which is related to the T-bill rate (as a measure of the opportunity cost of storing gold), gold futures prices should exhibit a well-defined relationship with T-bill futures prices in equilibrium. This article demonstrates that the futures markets for gold and T-bills are less than completely efficient relative to each other insofar as the interest rates implied by gold futures prices do tend to stray from their equilibrium level relative to the forward rates implied by the corresponding T-bill futures prices. If the market is inefficient from time to time and the implied gold rate is sometimes too high or too low relative to the implied T-bill rate, then one should be able to make abnormal profits by using trading rules based on the implied rates; evidence of such an ability is presented.

Section I provides a brief review of the literature concerning efficiency in futures markets. Section I1 discusses the nature of futures markets and the mechanics of the "arbitrage" which produces potential profits from observed disequilibria in the gold and T-bill markets. A trading procedure is proposed which is novel because it utilizes a "tail" and a hedge ratio for the gold spreads so as to isolate profit arising solely from changes in relative implied rates. The results of simulated trading over


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The relative efficiency of commodity fut
โœ Kellard, Neil; Newbold, Paul; Rayner, Tony; Ennew, Christine ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 203 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

The ability of futures markets to predict subsequent spot prices has been a controversial topic for a number of years. Empirical evidence to date is mixed; for any given market, some studies find evidence of efficiency, others of inefficiency. In part, these apparently conflicting findings reflect d

Cash-futures arbitrage and forward-futur
โœ Linda Allen; Thom Thurston ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 590 KB

ersistent discrepancies between implied forward rates on the yield curve P and corresponding futures rates have been widely observed. For instance, in one of our samples, eight week-ahead forward-future spreads averaged nearly 70 discount basis points before 1982 and have since averaged about 30 bas

Forecasting accuracy and development of
โœ Avraham Kamara ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 507 KB

F evaluate the economic benefits of futures markets is to examine their effects on the intertemporal allocation of resources. This issue was studied by DeCanio (1980) and Stein (1981Stein ( , 1986) ) who showed that the economic benefits of futures trading can be measured by the ex-post welfare loss

An empirical evaluation of treasury-bill
โœ S. Scott MacDonald; Scott E. Hein ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 782 KB

## Introduction any studies of futures market efficiency have used one of two basic methods M to examine market efficiency. The first method, widely used to examine the efficiency of commodity futures, is to regress the actual realized delivery-day spot rate against an earlier observed futures pri

An empirical analysis of arbitrage oppor
โœ Shantaram P. Hegde; Ben Branch ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 967 KB

Shantaram P. Hegde Ben Branch imultaneous spot and futures trading in T-bills permits investors to construct S a combination of spot and futures positions that is a close substitute for a corresponding pure spot bill position. If the net returns on the spot-futures combination exceed the comparable

On the informational role of treasury bi
โœ Shantaram P. Hegde; Bill McDonald ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 854 KB

I1 to 1983-111 both the future contract and the implied forward rate provide better forecasts of the future spot rate on a thirteen week T-bill than the Martingale forecast for up to four weeks prior to delivery of the futures contract. Further, the futures forecast outperforms the forward forecast