his article discusses the "hedging usefulness'' of the 90-day Treasury-T bill futures contract traded on the IMM. The articlk improves upon the methodology used previously by Ederington. The improvement is that the authors (referred to hereafter as CDV) use an actual bill-the 6-month T-bill delivera
On the informational role of treasury bill futures
β Scribed by Shantaram P. Hegde; Bill McDonald
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 854 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
I1 to 1983-111 both the future contract and the implied forward rate provide better forecasts of the future spot rate on a thirteen week T-bill than the Martingale forecast for up to four weeks prior to delivery of the futures contract. Further, the futures forecast outperforms the forward forecast up to three weeks from delivery, but between four to thirteen weeks prior to delivery the two forecasts are indistinguishable. Finally, we find no evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the nearterm futures rate reflects the information contained in the corresponding foward rate and vice versa.
'For an empirical test supporting Grossman's hypothesis see Brannen and Ulveling (1984).
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The purpose of that article was to present a model in which "when testing the effectiveness of hedging Treasury bills, one must take into account the term to maturity on the deliverable bill and adjust for the constant yield price accumulation." The Dale et al. analysis is misleading because it foc
n a recent article, examined the hedging performance I of financial futures markets using a portfolio model derived from the hedging theories of . His article concluded that GNMA futures were more effective than T-Bill futures in reducing price change risk. Moreover, in the short term, the performa
urrent regulations for financial intermediaries impose rigid constraints 011 C the interest rate maturity of deposit liabilities. While these regulations provide access to lower-cost funds, compared with the rate on borrowings of the same maturity, the maturity restrictions can generate undesirable
ersistent discrepancies between implied forward rates on the yield curve P and corresponding futures rates have been widely observed. For instance, in one of our samples, eight week-ahead forward-future spreads averaged nearly 70 discount basis points before 1982 and have since averaged about 30 bas