## Background: Although < 1% of men present with prostate-specific antigen (psa)-negative prostate carcinoma, in that they have serum psa levels much lower than the tumor burden would suggest, such patients represent a management dilemma. to the authors' knowledge, little information exists in the
The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of < 4 ng/mL
β Scribed by Carsten Stephan; Greta Stroebel; Marc Heinau; Andre Lenz; Andreas Roemer; Michael Lein; Dietmar Schnorr; Stefan A. Loening; Klaus Jung
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 236 KB
- Volume
- 104
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to evaluate the prostate specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) (the quotient of PSA and prostate volume) compared with the percent free PSA (%fPSA) in different total PSA (tPSA) ranges from 2 ng/mL to 20 ng/mL. Possible cutβoff levels depending on the tPSA should be established.
METHODS
In total, 1809 men with no pretreatment of the prostate were enrolled between 1996 and 2004. Total and free PSA were measured with the IMMULITE PSA and Free PSA kits (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound. The diagnostic validity of tPSA, %fPSA, and PSAD was evaluated by receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS
The PSAD differed significantly (P < 0.0001) between patients with prostate carcinoma and patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in all analyzed ranges of tPSA and prostate volume. At the 90% and 95% sensitivity levels and regarding the area under the ROC curve (AUC) within the tPSA range of 2β4 ng/mL, The PSAD was significantly better than tPSA and %fPSA. Within the tPSA range of 4β10 ng/mL, the PSAD did not perform better than %fPSA.
CONCLUSIONS
PSAD showed a better performance than %fPSA at tPSA concentrations < 4 ng/mL for detecting prostate carcinoma, with a significantly larger AUC for PSAD (0.739) compared with %fPSA (0.667). PSAD did not perform better than %fPSA when the tPSA range of 4β10 ng/mL was analyzed. Different PSAD cutβoff values of 0.05 at tPSA 2β4 ng/mL, 0.1 at tPSA 4β10 ng/mL, and 0.19 at 10β20 ng/mL were necessary to reach 95% sensitivity. Cancer 2005. Β© 2005 American Cancer Society.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Background. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is useful as a tumor marker for monitoring patients with prostate cancer after definitive therapy. Limitations have been noted when PSA was used for the early detection of prostate cancer. The use of prostate specific antigen density [PSAD = PSA (ng/ml)/pr
T1, 2, 3pN0, M0), 44 patients with BPH, and 54 healthy Charite Β΄, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Gercontrols. Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound. many. ## RESULTS. The median values of t-PSA and f-PSA% were 7.8 mg/L and 10.5% in PCa patients, 4.3 mg/L and 20.8% in patie